Rui C Costa
University of Aveiro, Communication and Art, Faculty Member
- Design, Design Research, Instructional Design, Visualization, Visual perception, User Centred Design, and 6 moreDesign Process (Architecture), Communication Design, Design Visualization (Architecture), Strategic Design, Visual Communication for Activism, and Rationality And Design (Architecture)edit
Twentieth century’s last decades witnessed a growing importance of information design, since then characterised and named in many ways, in a process of affirmation and self- discovery. The flood of available data gave design, namely to... more
Twentieth century’s last decades witnessed a growing importance of information design, since then characterised and named in many ways, in a process of affirmation and self- discovery. The flood of available data gave design, namely to this field of design for understanding, an increased visibility and responsibility to find new ways of making sense through information. From design to computer sciences, there are several disciplines that converge in this endeavour, even if under different tools and models.
This convergence enables a comparison between models of representation, which tend to be more respected if neutral and rational like. However, are not metaphor, paradox and poetics also tools able to provide structure to a set of complex data? The fear of uncertainty reveals a kind of insecurity, natural on a discipline with such a recent history in the academy, and that sometimes seems, for that same reason, to behave non-critically in choosing its own path. But if even physical sciences admit uncertainty, why should not design do it?
We argue that it is possible to represent with accuracy without blindly accept generic and algorithmic systems, and that the doubts that can emerge from such representations may contribute to non-communication but also elicit curiosity, enabling understanding thus promoting knowledge. It is the metaphor that will render possible the communication of the new, thus subjecting it to the rigors of poetics. Only poetics will make ‘newness’ possible.
This convergence enables a comparison between models of representation, which tend to be more respected if neutral and rational like. However, are not metaphor, paradox and poetics also tools able to provide structure to a set of complex data? The fear of uncertainty reveals a kind of insecurity, natural on a discipline with such a recent history in the academy, and that sometimes seems, for that same reason, to behave non-critically in choosing its own path. But if even physical sciences admit uncertainty, why should not design do it?
We argue that it is possible to represent with accuracy without blindly accept generic and algorithmic systems, and that the doubts that can emerge from such representations may contribute to non-communication but also elicit curiosity, enabling understanding thus promoting knowledge. It is the metaphor that will render possible the communication of the new, thus subjecting it to the rigors of poetics. Only poetics will make ‘newness’ possible.
Research Interests:
"Ao longo dos últimos anos a investigação em design, no seu percurso de afirmação como disciplina, tem tentado enfrentar a dispersão do seu campo de estudo. Ao mesmo tempo, esta dispersão é vista também como sendo a característica... more
"Ao longo dos últimos anos a investigação em design, no seu percurso de afirmação como disciplina, tem tentado enfrentar a dispersão do seu campo de estudo. Ao mesmo tempo, esta dispersão é vista também como sendo a característica principal do design. O design é assim continuamente visitado por este paradoxo de se afirmar desmentindo-se, limitando o seu campo de estudo não obstante tratar-se de uma disciplina que se desenvolve como interface. Neste (duplo) contexto de dispersão, o texto presente contraria esse sentido ao reflectir a tensão entre a parte e o todo concentrando-se num tema, complexo, onde se têm verificado convergências – a “estrutura” do design.
O argumento presente é o de que a existência de pequenos consensos pressupõe a disposição para uma subida de patamar na reflexão em design e no conhecimen- to de si próprio, que conduzirá necessariamente a novos percursos e perspectivas na abordagem à disciplina, tornando-a por esse caminho num corpo mais forte."
O argumento presente é o de que a existência de pequenos consensos pressupõe a disposição para uma subida de patamar na reflexão em design e no conhecimen- to de si próprio, que conduzirá necessariamente a novos percursos e perspectivas na abordagem à disciplina, tornando-a por esse caminho num corpo mais forte."
